It was the bypass cap for the power tubes, not a bad cap but any cap.
Its EL84, around a 8.5k load plate to plate, thank you dartanion, And I'm running
the plate volts fairly low, but every thing is 5/5 with published RCA AB1
push pull with around 300v (335 in this case). Anybody got a good explanation?
I've read arguments for and against cathode bypass of power tubes but
mostly from a fidelity/distortion view point. I've not had the pleasure of
such a dramatic example of distortion caused by bypass.
interesting issue, appears to be related to a high transconductance.
I would suspect loading too, EL84 and EL34 share a high trancontuctance,
But .... most practical experience with EL34 used a load 50% smaller.
6v6 an 6l6 have transconductances 2 to 3 times less than EL84.
Can't wait to find out more. First time I've run into this in such a critical way.
The real issue is that I like paraphase and seesaw inverters and made
assumptions about their application. The high transconductance encouraged
just enough grid current to frig up the inverter bias and raise bloody hell.
I've been using a seesaw very similar to vox, ampeg, and assumed that
it would act like any other paraphase, same dress works fine for other tube types.
I finally found a N. Crowhurst reference on it. Still get to use a seesaw, just not that one.
Finished voicing... the EF86 has ample gain, making lower gain tubes for the
following stages accessible and very useful as tone sources.
This thing is based on a Vox AC 15 with the EF86 pre and EL84 power side.
The client like very much an earlier amp I made that had a paraphase inverter.
So, instead of the very common cathode coupled inverter like that in a AC30
I used the one from an AC100 keeping the Vox design theme.
Now this is where I tried to screw myself into a corner in the build.
The high transconductance and my design assumptions created a condition
that sounded like a good many things, with EL84 and a 8 to 10k load
a fixed and self balancing paraphase inverters, and seesaw inverters with
the inverting signal derived after the coupling caps might see some
power tube G1 grid current on the inverting stage grid if you don't use the
extra coupling cap. Its easy to make assumptions based on build successes.
A known circuit tried to bite back with a different tube type in the power side.
The tones are interesting, and cover two common VOX design features.
The bass control swing back and forth between a "normal" and "brilliant"
channel tone, and the treble covers the "brite" control territory fairly well.
Both are high impedance and play well in the EF86, keep the layout simple,
and more importantly don't carve out the gain structure.
The cathode bypass values are critical, small, 10 uf on the EF86 and ...
0.47 uf respecting the high tranconductance of the EL84.
This is the opposite approach of most current design trends, there just is
no real need to maximize gain with a EF86, the low end is tight enough
and the usable bandwidth is appropriate to the instrument, no farting out
and no trespassing on the bass player. The only feedback is degenerative
through the inverter cathode and from the inverter it self because the
inverted signal is differential in nature.
I'm kinda bummed that its going out the door, don't get that too often.
The clean tone color is unreal.
The pt and opt are good, no issues, the opt is very good tone wise.
Thank you again. might need another set pretty quick.
Its nice to not have to make concessions with your chosen operating point.