NFB loop original
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
NFB loop original
Has anyone ever seen an original, HAD made, NFB implementation with values other than the "standard" 10M+10M+0.047uF+10M+10M?
Teo
Teo
- phsyconoodler
- Posts: 282
- Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 3:07 am
- Location: calgary canada
- Contact:
Re: NFB loop original
You can use the amp without it at all and it just lowers the headroom and makes the amp more touch sensitive.That can be good or bad.
Try lower values.They all have a different vibe up to a point and then they just don't do much at all.
The correct name for this feedback is 'local feedback' and not 'negative feedback',as it injects it into V1 and not at the phase inverter.There are lots of ways to alter the tones in the dumble and the local and negative feedback areas are good places to play with.
I like to use a switch to switch the local feedback in or out.
Try lower values.They all have a different vibe up to a point and then they just don't do much at all.
The correct name for this feedback is 'local feedback' and not 'negative feedback',as it injects it into V1 and not at the phase inverter.There are lots of ways to alter the tones in the dumble and the local and negative feedback areas are good places to play with.
I like to use a switch to switch the local feedback in or out.
Crystal latice or vacuum,that is the question.
- martin manning
- Posts: 14308
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: NFB loop original
Not to 'jack the thread, but strictly speaking it is "local negative feedback," no? Local negative feedback as opposed to "global negative feedback" from the OT secondary.phsyconoodler wrote:The correct name for this feedback is 'local feedback' and not 'negative feedback',as it injects it into V1 and not at the phase inverter.
MPM
Re: NFB loop original
I am assuming you are speaking about the second gain stage here. In the pics I have seen there was no LNFB or the 10M+10M+0.047uF+10M+10M configuration. I have seen 22M's instead of 2x 10M.
I have even seen 10M + 10M + 10M + 10M + 0.047uF.
The return of the Dumbleator was 22M (or 10M + 10M) and 0.22uF.
There may be more but I haven't seen it.
Jelle
I have even seen 10M + 10M + 10M + 10M + 0.047uF.
The return of the Dumbleator was 22M (or 10M + 10M) and 0.22uF.
There may be more but I haven't seen it.
Jelle
-
Fischerman
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 3:47 pm
- Location: Georgia
Re: NFB loop original
Yes, it is local negative feedback.
Also, IIRC the local NFB on the Return stage in the D'Lator uses different values than the local NFB on V1b.
I think it's the other way around...higher value resistors will have less and less effect until the circuit makes no difference...lower values will have a more pronounced effect until it 'chokes' the stage too much.Try lower values.They all have a different vibe up to a point and then they just don't do much at all.
Also, IIRC the local NFB on the Return stage in the D'Lator uses different values than the local NFB on V1b.
Re: NFB loop original
Not challenging you, just curious, did you see pictures or real amps with 22m instead of 2x10m? And in your experience (or anyone else), do you think there is any difference?jelle wrote:I am assuming you are speaking about the second gain stage here. In the pics I have seen there was no LNFB or the 10M+10M+0.047uF+10M+10M configuration. I have seen 22M's instead of 2x 10M.
I have even seen 10M + 10M + 10M + 10M + 0.047uF.
The return of the Dumbleator was 22M (or 10M + 10M) and 0.22uF.
There may be more but I haven't seen it.
Jelle
Thanks.
- glasman
- Posts: 1446
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:37 pm
- Location: Afton, MN (St Croix River Valley)
- Contact:
Re: NFB loop original
Glaswerks have been using a dual setup for a few years. In the up position it is 44M total and in the down position it is 22M, with center being out of the circuit.
I have always found the 22M setting to be interesting depending on the sound I am looking for.....
Gary
I have always found the 22M setting to be interesting depending on the sound I am looking for.....
Gary
Located in the St Croix River Valley- Afton, MN
About 5 miles south of I-94
aka K0GWA, K0 Glas Werks Amplification
www.glaswerks.com
About 5 miles south of I-94
aka K0GWA, K0 Glas Werks Amplification
www.glaswerks.com
- glasman
- Posts: 1446
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:37 pm
- Location: Afton, MN (St Croix River Valley)
- Contact:
Re: NFB loop original
Normally HAD used 10M resistors, I don't remember ever seeing pics with 22M, but I have not seen every Dumble every built either.
Gary
Gary
Located in the St Croix River Valley- Afton, MN
About 5 miles south of I-94
aka K0GWA, K0 Glas Werks Amplification
www.glaswerks.com
About 5 miles south of I-94
aka K0GWA, K0 Glas Werks Amplification
www.glaswerks.com
Re: NFB loop original
I have a pic of an HRM with lnfb on the V1. There is one orange drop cap and one resistor on each side. You can't see the bands, but I'd assume it is a 22M on each side for a total of 44M.
This HRM had other wacky values fwiw. It is not like HRM 101.
This HRM had other wacky values fwiw. It is not like HRM 101.
- phsyconoodler
- Posts: 282
- Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 3:07 am
- Location: calgary canada
- Contact:
Re: NFB loop original
I do know that it's local 'negative' feedback.And sorry about not being clearer about the effect of the resistors.Of course as the values go up the effect gets to be less pronounced.
I like the sound with them out altogether.Very fluid transistion to overdrive.
I lifted the negative feedback(global) on a two rock reverb signature and it became a monster rock machine.Too much for the jazz player that was looking for a bit of clean boost!
I like the sound with them out altogether.Very fluid transistion to overdrive.
I lifted the negative feedback(global) on a two rock reverb signature and it became a monster rock machine.Too much for the jazz player that was looking for a bit of clean boost!
Crystal latice or vacuum,that is the question.
Re: NFB loop original
What do you think about them being 10M on each side?dogears wrote:I have a pic of an HRM with lnfb on the V1. There is one orange drop cap and one resistor on each side. You can't see the bands, but I'd assume it is a 22M on each side for a total of 44M.
Teo
- glasman
- Posts: 1446
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:37 pm
- Location: Afton, MN (St Croix River Valley)
- Contact:
Re: NFB loop original
I would doubt it, the reason is that with two 10Megs you would severely restrict the gain of V1B. As the HRM input trim circuit knocks down the signal even more, I doubt that there would be sufficient drive for the HRM.llemtt wrote:What do you think about them being 10M on each side?dogears wrote:I have a pic of an HRM with lnfb on the V1. There is one orange drop cap and one resistor on each side. You can't see the bands, but I'd assume it is a 22M on each side for a total of 44M.
Teo
I wil have to try it later today. My amps are setup to use either 22M or 44M and I will try it in 22M with the POStack enabled.
Gary
Located in the St Croix River Valley- Afton, MN
About 5 miles south of I-94
aka K0GWA, K0 Glas Werks Amplification
www.glaswerks.com
About 5 miles south of I-94
aka K0GWA, K0 Glas Werks Amplification
www.glaswerks.com
Re: NFB loop original
Without a 100k trimmer (or 220K trimmer) I do not care for it. Just like you said, Gary, not enough gain.
jelle
jelle
- glasman
- Posts: 1446
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:37 pm
- Location: Afton, MN (St Croix River Valley)
- Contact:
Re: NFB loop original
Yup, that 100K trimmer will help a lot and the 220K might even be better.jelle wrote:Without a 100k trimmer (or 220K trimmer) I do not care for it. Just like you said, Gary, not enough gain.
jelle
The 20Meg really flattens the BW out a lot, but it also tends to compress a bit (or a lot more). Of course it is just another color in my box of Crayolas
Located in the St Croix River Valley- Afton, MN
About 5 miles south of I-94
aka K0GWA, K0 Glas Werks Amplification
www.glaswerks.com
About 5 miles south of I-94
aka K0GWA, K0 Glas Werks Amplification
www.glaswerks.com
Re: NFB loop original
That 100W Glaswerks was great! Nice job, Gary. 