#102 Presence cap
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
#102 Presence cap
I did a fair bit of searching and reading, but didn't really find a definitive answer. Does anyone know the type/composition of the 2.2uF presence cap in 102? Based on Tony's layout and what I have read, I thought this might be a tantalum dipped or small film cap of some sort. Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
Thanks
Re: #102 Presence cap
It think it is a tantalum cap based on this pic: https://ampgarage.com/forum/download/fi ... &mode=view
Re: #102 Presence cap
Thank you very much Erwin. Yes, that looks like the tantalum form factor. Any thoughts on substituting other dielectrics, or is it better to just stay with tantalum?
Re: #102 Presence cap
I only used electrolytic and tantalum on that spot.
It is a easy subtitute to experiment. The tantalum opens up earlier when turning the presence pot clockwise.
Imo both do the job well. Taste differences
It is a easy subtitute to experiment. The tantalum opens up earlier when turning the presence pot clockwise.
Imo both do the job well. Taste differences
Re: #102 Presence cap
Interesting. I was thinking of ordering both a tantalum and a non polarized electrolytic, but I have a Solen MKP on hand, so might try it for fun. Thanks Erwin!
Re: #102 Presence cap
What's the correct polarity for this position?
-
Charlie Wilson
- Posts: 1140
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 7:32 pm
Re: #102 Presence cap
Hmmm?
CW
CW
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: #102 Presence cap
One off or also seen in other amps CW?
Re: #102 Presence cap
IMO.. There are no accidents goofs mistakes or coincidences when it comes to HAD.
Tony
Tony
" The psychics on my bench is the same as Dumble'"
-
Charlie Wilson
- Posts: 1140
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 7:32 pm
Re: #102 Presence cap
Yeah weirdo #124
CW
- martin manning
- Posts: 14308
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: #102 Presence cap
Applying any continuous DC voltage in reverse polarity to a tantalum cap is not recommended, as it can be damaged or destroyed. They will stand some AC, but only up to a small fraction of the rated DC voltage. For this application, at only 1 or 2 µF, a low voltage film cap is a good option.
-
Charlie Wilson
- Posts: 1140
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 7:32 pm
1 others liked this
Re: #102 Presence cap
Once again, Dumble doing it wrong.
CW
CW
- martin manning
- Posts: 14308
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: #102 Presence cap
Looks more like an aluminum electrolytic to me. It seems too tall and too cylindrical to be a tantalum.erwin_ve wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:59 pm It think it is a tantalum cap based on this pic: https://ampgarage.com/forum/download/fi ... &mode=view
Re: #102 Presence cap
Martin, maybe, I have some big blue tantalums that are tall as in this pic.martin manning wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 11:00 pmLooks more like an aluminum electrolytic to me. It seems too tall and too cylindrical to be a tantalum.erwin_ve wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:59 pm It think it is a tantalum cap based on this pic: https://ampgarage.com/forum/download/fi ... &mode=view
Luckily these parts are cheap and a easy swap for experimentation purposes.