#102 Presence cap

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

User avatar
Colossal
Posts: 5205
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:04 pm
Location: Moving through Kashmir

#102 Presence cap

Post by Colossal »

I did a fair bit of searching and reading, but didn't really find a definitive answer. Does anyone know the type/composition of the 2.2uF presence cap in 102? Based on Tony's layout and what I have read, I thought this might be a tantalum dipped or small film cap of some sort. Any help is appreciated.

Thanks
User avatar
erwin_ve
Posts: 1792
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 8:06 am
Location: Dordrecht, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: #102 Presence cap

Post by erwin_ve »

It think it is a tantalum cap based on this pic: https://ampgarage.com/forum/download/fi ... &mode=view
User avatar
Colossal
Posts: 5205
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:04 pm
Location: Moving through Kashmir

Re: #102 Presence cap

Post by Colossal »

Thank you very much Erwin. Yes, that looks like the tantalum form factor. Any thoughts on substituting other dielectrics, or is it better to just stay with tantalum?
User avatar
erwin_ve
Posts: 1792
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 8:06 am
Location: Dordrecht, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: #102 Presence cap

Post by erwin_ve »

I only used electrolytic and tantalum on that spot.
It is a easy subtitute to experiment. The tantalum opens up earlier when turning the presence pot clockwise.
Imo both do the job well. Taste differences :D
User avatar
Colossal
Posts: 5205
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:04 pm
Location: Moving through Kashmir

Re: #102 Presence cap

Post by Colossal »

erwin_ve wrote: Sat Nov 23, 2019 4:55 pm I only used electrolytic and tantalum on that spot.
It is a easy subtitute to experiment. The tantalum opens up earlier when turning the presence pot clockwise.
Imo both do the job well. Taste differences :D
Interesting. I was thinking of ordering both a tantalum and a non polarized electrolytic, but I have a Solen MKP on hand, so might try it for fun. Thanks Erwin!
User avatar
Mr. dB
Posts: 273
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 6:58 pm
Location: Little Rock, Arkansas

Re: #102 Presence cap

Post by Mr. dB »

What's the correct polarity for this position?
User avatar
erwin_ve
Posts: 1792
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 8:06 am
Location: Dordrecht, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: #102 Presence cap

Post by erwin_ve »

Mr. dB wrote: Sat Nov 23, 2019 6:10 pm What's the correct polarity for this position?
Minus to earth- duh :)
Charlie Wilson
Posts: 1140
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 7:32 pm

Re: #102 Presence cap

Post by Charlie Wilson »

Hmmm? :D
CW
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
erwin_ve
Posts: 1792
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 8:06 am
Location: Dordrecht, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: #102 Presence cap

Post by erwin_ve »

Charlie Wilson wrote: Sat Nov 23, 2019 8:08 pm Hmmm? :D
CW
:D #124 ? Whats the verdict on this one?
One off or also seen in other amps CW?
talbany
Posts: 4696
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 5:03 am
Location: Dumbleland

Re: #102 Presence cap

Post by talbany »

IMO.. There are no accidents goofs mistakes or coincidences when it comes to HAD. 8)

Tony
" The psychics on my bench is the same as Dumble'"
Charlie Wilson
Posts: 1140
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 7:32 pm

Re: #102 Presence cap

Post by Charlie Wilson »

erwin_ve wrote: Sat Nov 23, 2019 11:08 pm
Charlie Wilson wrote: Sat Nov 23, 2019 8:08 pm Hmmm? :D
CW
:D #124 ? Whats the verdict on this one?
One off or also seen in other amps CW?
Yeah weirdo #124 :D This is the only amp I have seen him do it in but I agree with Tony, I think he did it on purpose. It kind of softens or smears the top end a bit when you have the polarity reversed. That cap only sees about .5v of DC and the cap doesn't seem to have a problem with it. I had it that way in my amp for awhile. Easy enough thing to try and see if you like it. I think most people will prefer it the way you suggest with negative to ground.
CW
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: #102 Presence cap

Post by martin manning »

Applying any continuous DC voltage in reverse polarity to a tantalum cap is not recommended, as it can be damaged or destroyed. They will stand some AC, but only up to a small fraction of the rated DC voltage. For this application, at only 1 or 2 µF, a low voltage film cap is a good option.
Charlie Wilson
Posts: 1140
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 7:32 pm

Re: #102 Presence cap

Post by Charlie Wilson »

Once again, Dumble doing it wrong. :roll:
CW
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: #102 Presence cap

Post by martin manning »

erwin_ve wrote: Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:59 pm It think it is a tantalum cap based on this pic: https://ampgarage.com/forum/download/fi ... &mode=view
Looks more like an aluminum electrolytic to me. It seems too tall and too cylindrical to be a tantalum.
User avatar
erwin_ve
Posts: 1792
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 8:06 am
Location: Dordrecht, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: #102 Presence cap

Post by erwin_ve »

martin manning wrote: Sun Nov 24, 2019 11:00 pm
erwin_ve wrote: Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:59 pm It think it is a tantalum cap based on this pic: https://ampgarage.com/forum/download/fi ... &mode=view
Looks more like an aluminum electrolytic to me. It seems too tall and too cylindrical to be a tantalum.
Martin, maybe, I have some big blue tantalums that are tall as in this pic.
Luckily these parts are cheap and a easy swap for experimentation purposes.
Post Reply