PT with multiple secondarys question

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

User avatar
Bob-I
Posts: 3791
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Hillsborough NJ

PT with multiple secondarys question

Post by Bob-I »

I'm using this PT for my Princeton/Dumble build.

http://www.classictone.net/40-18027.pdf

There are 2 secondary taps allowing either 400V or 330V output. I'd like to put a switch on the back to select either secondary for different power levels and feel.

The question is on the bias. There's no bias tap on this PT so I need to tap from one of the secondary leads. Should I tap from one of the secondaries directly, or should I switch the bias tap when I switch the secondary?

My concern is that I may not have enough range on the bias pot to handle switching secondary voltage.

Thoughts?
John_P_WI
Posts: 1457
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:29 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Re: PT with multiple secondarys question

Post by John_P_WI »

Simple solution. Use a DPDT On-On switch, the "330" leads go to one set of contacts, the "400" leads go to the other set of contacts. The center "common" contacts go to your diode string, take the bias off of both leads (keeps things balanced) before the main rectifier diode string. Use a high quality full size Carling switch. Your bias will adjust with the change in high voltage.
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: PT with multiple secondarys question

Post by martin manning »

How about a DPDT on-off-on switch in the standby hole? Center position is standby, and the other two are high and low voltage. I agree take the bias from the center of the switch, either half- or full-wave.
John_P_WI
Posts: 1457
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:29 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Re: PT with multiple secondarys question

Post by John_P_WI »

martin manning wrote:How about a DPDT on-off-on switch in the standby hole?
Good question Martin, I try to avoid that as the bias voltage is at 0 v when switched, and IMHO the full bias voltage should be present WHEN the B+ supply is switched (as found with the "conventional" circuit position of the Standby switch.
User avatar
Bob-I
Posts: 3791
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Hillsborough NJ

Re: PT with multiple secondarys question

Post by Bob-I »

John_P_WI wrote:Simple solution. Use a DPDT On-On switch, the "330" leads go to one set of contacts, the "400" leads go to the other set of contacts. The center "common" contacts go to your diode string, take the bias off of both leads (keeps things balanced) before the main rectifier diode string. Use a high quality full size Carling switch. Your bias will adjust with the change in high voltage.
I'm confused, are you saying to take the bias off of both the 400V and 330V taps? Wouldn't that then connect these taps together?
User avatar
Bob-I
Posts: 3791
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Hillsborough NJ

Re: PT with multiple secondarys question

Post by Bob-I »

martin manning wrote:How about a DPDT on-off-on switch in the standby hole? Center position is standby, and the other two are high and low voltage. I agree take the bias from the center of the switch, either half- or full-wave.
Um... I won't do that. No bias on standby
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: PT with multiple secondarys question

Post by martin manning »

John_P_WI wrote:
martin manning wrote:How about a DPDT on-off-on switch in the standby hole?
Good question Martin, I try to avoid that as the bias voltage is at 0 v when switched, and IMHO the full bias voltage should be present WHEN the B+ supply is switched (as found with the "conventional" circuit position of the Standby switch.
Ah, very good point! Two switches are better than one, but even then as the switch is thrown the AC to the bias supply is cut.
Last edited by martin manning on Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
John_P_WI
Posts: 1457
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:29 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Re: PT with multiple secondarys question

Post by John_P_WI »

Bob-I wrote: I'm confused, are you saying to take the bias off of both the 400V and 330V taps? Wouldn't that then connect these taps together?
No, the 330 / 400 v transformer wires go to the switch, from the switch center poles two wires go to the rectifier diode string. Connect the bias (dropping resistors and diodes) at the junction of the two wires and two B+ diode strings.

Sorry if I confused you when I was proposed using both legs of the transformer for the bias, not a single (like marshall) to keep the balance on the power transformer winding.
User avatar
Bob-I
Posts: 3791
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Hillsborough NJ

Re: PT with multiple secondarys question

Post by Bob-I »

John_P_WI wrote: Sorry if I confused you when I was proposed using both legs of the transformer for the bias, not a single (like marshall) to keep the balance on the power transformer winding.
No problem. This is what I drew up as you were replying...

I'm gonna redraw... hold on
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Bob-I
Posts: 3791
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Hillsborough NJ

Re: PT with multiple secondarys question

Post by Bob-I »

Like this?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
John_P_WI
Posts: 1457
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:29 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Re: PT with multiple secondarys question

Post by John_P_WI »

Yes, just make sure the down stream components (pot and resistor) etc are connected otherwise the cap will see the full rectified voltage of the 330 / 400 (which ever is selected) vac windings.
User avatar
Bob-I
Posts: 3791
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Hillsborough NJ

Re: PT with multiple secondarys question

Post by Bob-I »

John_P_WI wrote:Yes, just make sure the down stream components (pot and resistor) etc are connected otherwise the cap will see the full rectified voltage of the 330 / 400 (which ever is selected) vac windings.
Good point, I think I'll change that cap JIC
User avatar
Bob-I
Posts: 3791
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Hillsborough NJ

Re: PT with multiple secondarys question

Post by Bob-I »

Here's the rectifier/bias board I built. Whatcha think?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: PT with multiple secondarys question

Post by martin manning »

John_P_WI wrote:Yes, just make sure the down stream components (pot and resistor) etc are connected otherwise the cap will see the full rectified voltage of the 330 / 400 (which ever is selected) vac windings.
I haven't seen it done before, but a voltage divider could be placed in front of the cap to protect it. This would only require adding a resistor across the cap to ground.
User avatar
Bob-I
Posts: 3791
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Hillsborough NJ

Re: PT with multiple secondarys question

Post by Bob-I »

martin manning wrote:
John_P_WI wrote:Yes, just make sure the down stream components (pot and resistor) etc are connected otherwise the cap will see the full rectified voltage of the 330 / 400 (which ever is selected) vac windings.
I haven't seen it done before, but a voltage divider could be placed in front of the cap to protect it. This would only require adding a resistor across the cap to ground.
That's a 350V cap, even if it gets hit with 400 briefly it should survive.
Post Reply