NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
jfs322
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:12 am

Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W

Post by jfs322 »

neskor wrote: Mon Apr 12, 2021 5:34 pm I think you are right, this is probably V2
There is also a signature on the back, so I assume this is JM signature. My wrong :(
Nope, it is a different "JM" -- Joe Mloganoski, co-founder of Two-Rock. The top signature is Bill Krinard's (the other co-founder of Two-Rock).
neskor
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2020 1:53 pm

Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W

Post by neskor »

Thanks for the info :wink:
Sound was great, but both #124 and mine #102 was IMHO better sounding.
rootz
Posts: 721
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:24 pm
Location: Delft, The Netherlands

Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W

Post by rootz »

My bad, you are totally right. MK3 has the tweed style mixer, 2 the Fender style. My apologies for the confusion.
rootz
Posts: 721
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:24 pm
Location: Delft, The Netherlands

Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W

Post by rootz »

Just curious: what ODS type is the preamp? 102?

It will never sound like a ODS though. Contour, reverb, half a dumbleator, etc. Lots of differences.
jfs322
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:12 am

Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W

Post by jfs322 »

rootz wrote: Mon Apr 12, 2021 6:53 pm Just curious: what ODS type is the preamp? 102?

It will never sound like a ODS though. Contour, reverb, half a dumbleator, etc. Lots of differences.
From what I recall of the Custom Reverb Signature line, they are all high plate skylines. The Classic Reverb / Mayer line of amps are low plate classics.
dbharris
Posts: 557
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:55 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W

Post by dbharris »

Still cool to see more gut shots. Thanks for sharing! If nothing else this was around the same time period as the JM sig amps and we see similar parts selection...draloric LCA for most of the circuit, NTE GNFB resistor, philips bypass caps, new production dale plates, etc. Very cool!

-Dan
User avatar
norburybrook
Posts: 3290
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W

Post by norburybrook »

rootz wrote: Mon Apr 12, 2021 4:46 pm Diodes: https://ixapps.ixys.com/DataSheet/DSEI12-12A.pdf
are they diodes? they look like voltage regulators at first glance. I've never seen a diode like this :D


you learn something everyday.


M
User avatar
pompeiisneaks
Site Admin
Posts: 4244
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
Location: Washington State, USA
Contact:

Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W

Post by pompeiisneaks »

Yes I've seen both single and dual diodes like this a ton in SMPS's and the like, the larger body allows for better current handling I think, and heatsinking if needed.

~Phil
tUber Nerd!
neskor
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2020 1:53 pm

Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W

Post by neskor »

I just removed cap from RETURN pot and sound is now so much clearer
What is the purpose of that cap anyway?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
jfs322
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:12 am

Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W

Post by jfs322 »

neskor wrote: Fri Apr 16, 2021 5:48 pm I just removed cap from RETURN pot and sound is now so much clearer
What is the purpose of that cap anyway?
It adds a little brightness to the reverb signal, and at higher reverb levels, adds some "splash." If you prefer it without it, then keep it without a cap. In fact, it's something that Two-Rock apparently preferred as well, because on the Crystal amps (a re-release of the JM circuit about 8 years after the limited edition run), they removed that cap.
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W

Post by martin manning »

jfs322 wrote: Fri Apr 16, 2021 7:21 pm
neskor wrote: Fri Apr 16, 2021 5:48 pm I just removed cap from RETURN pot and sound is now so much clearer
What is the purpose of that cap anyway?
It adds a little brightness to the reverb signal, and at higher reverb levels, adds some "splash." If you prefer it without it, then keep it without a cap. In fact, it's something that Two-Rock apparently preferred as well, because on the Crystal amps (a re-release of the JM circuit about 8 years after the limited edition run), they removed that cap.
I think just the opposite. Any time you have a cap to ground it is going to bleed off high frequencies. This 10n cap across the return pot will reduce high frequencies and reduce the level of the reverb return signal.
neskor
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2020 1:53 pm

Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W

Post by neskor »

I had a same feeling, more pF darken the sound, also lower the reverb level
jfs322
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:12 am

Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W

Post by jfs322 »

martin manning wrote: Fri Apr 16, 2021 8:38 pm
jfs322 wrote: Fri Apr 16, 2021 7:21 pm
neskor wrote: Fri Apr 16, 2021 5:48 pm I just removed cap from RETURN pot and sound is now so much clearer
What is the purpose of that cap anyway?
It adds a little brightness to the reverb signal, and at higher reverb levels, adds some "splash." If you prefer it without it, then keep it without a cap. In fact, it's something that Two-Rock apparently preferred as well, because on the Crystal amps (a re-release of the JM circuit about 8 years after the limited edition run), they removed that cap.
I think just the opposite. Any time you have a cap to ground it is going to bleed off high frequencies. This 10n cap across the return pot will reduce high frequencies and reduce the level of the reverb return signal.
Yes, my mistake -- I was speaking in terms of what removing the reverb cap would do (i.e. brighten up the reverb a bit relative to the sound with the cap in place), not speaking in terms of what adding the cap does. So I was just talking about it from the "flipside of the coin," so to speak. My apologies for the confusion.
Last edited by jfs322 on Sat Apr 17, 2021 6:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Bombacaototal
Posts: 1711
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:53 am

Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W

Post by Bombacaototal »

I think Two Rock added the cap to (i) address the reverb hum, which happens due to the classic tone PT and small headshell, and placement of the tank. (II) reduce the amount of reverb for a better dry/wet ratio given they use the 1M resistor on the dry path which really reduces gain (III) as mentioned above to make the reverb darker
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W

Post by martin manning »

Bombacaototal wrote: Sat Apr 17, 2021 5:36 am I think Two Rock added the cap to (i) address the reverb hum, which happens due to the classic tone PT and small headshell, and placement of the tank.
The value of the cap used will have very little effect at 50-60 Hz, so reducing hum is not likely to be a factor. I can agree that a poorly positioned reverb tank can create a hum problem, but why do you think the Classic Tone PT is worse than others?
Post Reply