I would tuck all three of those white wires into the upper corner, and run the one from the switch over and straight down on the back panel opposite it’s destination on the PT. It then crosses all the other wires at 90 degrees.norburybrook wrote: ↑Thu Jan 24, 2019 12:46 pmp.s. from an aesthetic point of view I don't really like the white flown wire to the on /off switch would it be better to run it along the floor of the chassis? it will be crossing a lot of other wires though and I was worried about noise. the amp is very quiet as it is.
yes.... I Know....I'm starting a #183 build!
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
- martin manning
- Posts: 14308
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: yes.... I Know....I'm starting a #183 build!
Re: yes.... I Know....I'm starting a #183 build!
Nice work on this #183 Marcus. The By Norbury Suits very wellnorburybrook wrote: ↑Thu Jan 24, 2019 1:01 pm
I still don't like the PAB on most ODS amps, it's probably designed for people who play high output neck humbuckers as it cuts the low end. probably be good for cutting high gain tones maybe. Not my thing though.
M
On the Pab: I still have to try this myself bit this is a trick that Gary from Glaswerk posted a while ago: "Shunt the 22M PAB resistor between the Treble and Bass with a 0.01uf cap in series with a 470K resistor." This would cut some boost, but bit more balanced with more bass.
- norburybrook
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: yes.... I Know....I'm starting a #183 build!
Thankserwin_ve wrote: ↑Thu Jan 24, 2019 2:47 pmNice work on this #183 Marcus. The By Norbury Suits very wellnorburybrook wrote: ↑Thu Jan 24, 2019 1:01 pm
I still don't like the PAB on most ODS amps, it's probably designed for people who play high output neck humbuckers as it cuts the low end. probably be good for cutting high gain tones maybe. Not my thing though.
M![]()
On the Pab: I still have to try this myself bit this is a trick that Gary from Glaswerk posted a while ago: "Shunt the 22M PAB resistor between the Treble and Bass with a 0.01uf cap in series with a 470K resistor." This would cut some boost, but bit more balanced with more bass.
@martin , it's actually only one wire, the others are against the rear panel, not clear in the shot.
M
Re: yes.... I Know....I'm starting a #183 build!
Let me rephrase that: in order to get more bass with pab you could do as above but you loose some boost.norburybrook wrote: ↑Thu Jan 24, 2019 3:02 pmThankserwin_ve wrote: ↑Thu Jan 24, 2019 2:47 pmNice work on this #183 Marcus. The By Norbury Suits very wellnorburybrook wrote: ↑Thu Jan 24, 2019 1:01 pm
I still don't like the PAB on most ODS amps, it's probably designed for people who play high output neck humbuckers as it cuts the low end. probably be good for cutting high gain tones maybe. Not my thing though.
M![]()
On the Pab: I still have to try this myself bit this is a trick that Gary from Glaswerk posted a while ago: "Shunt the 22M PAB resistor between the Treble and Bass with a 0.01uf cap in series with a 470K resistor." This would cut some boost, but bit more balanced with more bass.It's not the gain boost it's the lack of bass and the 'thinning' of the sound. Perhaps just a straight tone lift would be more up my street
![]()
M
- norburybrook
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: yes.... I Know....I'm starting a #183 build!
Bit of splicing required but here we go, much nicer.martin manning wrote: ↑Thu Jan 24, 2019 2:14 pmI would tuck all three of those white wires into the upper corner, and run the one from the switch over and straight down on the back panel opposite it’s destination on the PT. It then crosses all the other wires at 90 degrees.norburybrook wrote: ↑Thu Jan 24, 2019 12:46 pmp.s. from an aesthetic point of view I don't really like the white flown wire to the on /off switch would it be better to run it along the floor of the chassis? it will be crossing a lot of other wires though and I was worried about noise. the amp is very quiet as it is.
my replacement 3k3's arrived today so they're now in. Shame they weren't black!
m
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: yes.... I Know....I'm starting a #183 build!
Well done Marcus!
I'm not seeing a FET circuit board. Do you plan to add one?
I'm not seeing a FET circuit board. Do you plan to add one?
- Reeltarded
- Posts: 10189
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
- Location: GA USA
Re: yes.... I Know....I'm starting a #183 build!
easy fix for pesky work.. do a day long series of shootouts and tell the client you are looking for "subtle nuance".. gah, no wonder we lost our funny accent.
Speaking of taxes, I'd write this session off as a business dinner by constantly eating sandwiches and hammering martinis.
"Oops.. one more time. Thought I heard a burp but it was me.. take eighty-whatever.. Bluesmaster slightly more mids.."
Speaking of taxes, I'd write this session off as a business dinner by constantly eating sandwiches and hammering martinis.
"Oops.. one more time. Thought I heard a burp but it was me.. take eighty-whatever.. Bluesmaster slightly more mids.."
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
- norburybrook
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
- norburybrook
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
2 others liked this
Re: yes.... I Know....I'm starting a #183 build!
I had to do it. It's my last ODS build so I wanted it to be as good as it could be. It's been a journey.Reeltarded wrote: ↑Thu Jan 24, 2019 3:33 pm easy fix for pesky work.. do a day long series of shootouts and tell the client you are looking for "subtle nuance".. gah, no wonder we lost our funny accent.
Speaking of taxes, I'd write this session off as a business dinner by constantly eating sandwiches and hammering martinis.
"Oops.. one more time. Thought I heard a burp but it was me.. take eighty-whatever.. Bluesmaster slightly more mids.."
M
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- pompeiisneaks
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4244
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
- Location: Washington State, USA
- Contact:
1 others liked this
Re: yes.... I Know....I'm starting a #183 build!
Outstanding stuff Marcus! Well done!
~Phil
~Phil
tUber Nerd!
Re: yes.... I Know....I'm starting a #183 build!
Hello Marcus --
Promise to avoid reminding of this should you adventure to making another ODS when future urges strike.
Best .. Ian
That turned out just gleaming & brilliant. Look forward to hearing your next batch of recordings.norburybrook wrote: ↑Thu Jan 24, 2019 3:36 pm I had to do it. It's my last ODS build so I wanted it to be as good as it could be. It's been a journey.![]()
Promise to avoid reminding of this should you adventure to making another ODS when future urges strike.
Best .. Ian
Re: yes.... I Know....I'm starting a #183 build!
Marcus
Nice work and congrats!.A few questions regarding your 183 amp?
1. Can you tell a difference in an ODS with EL-34's vs 6L's
2. What style of music do you think that circuit best suits?
3. What guitar sounds best to you in that amp?
4. Which blooms and sustains best?
5. Which amp is the most fun to play?
As far as the PAB goes. I rarely use that function at home in my studio just woodshedding however I use it quite frequently in a band setting especially with my les Paul.
Yeah I am not going to build anymore either.
Tony
Nice work and congrats!.A few questions regarding your 183 amp?
1. Can you tell a difference in an ODS with EL-34's vs 6L's
2. What style of music do you think that circuit best suits?
3. What guitar sounds best to you in that amp?
4. Which blooms and sustains best?
5. Which amp is the most fun to play?
As far as the PAB goes. I rarely use that function at home in my studio just woodshedding however I use it quite frequently in a band setting especially with my les Paul.
Yeah I am not going to build anymore either.
Tony
" The psychics on my bench is the same as Dumble'"
- norburybrook
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
1 others liked this
Re: yes.... I Know....I'm starting a #183 build!
thanks Tony.talbany wrote: ↑Thu Jan 24, 2019 9:10 pm Marcus
Nice work and congrats!.A few questions regarding your 183 amp?
1. Can you tell a difference in an ODS with EL-34's vs 6L's
2. What style of music do you think that circuit best suits?
3. What guitar sounds best to you in that amp?
4. Which blooms and sustains best?
5. Which amp is the most fun to play?
As far as the PAB goes. I rarely use that function at home in my studio just woodshedding however I use it quite frequently in a band setting especially with my les Paul.![]()
Yeah I am not going to build anymore either.![]()
Tony
I'll answer your questions when I've had chance to get to know this one better.
My first impressions were really about the overdrive on this amp compared to the #102 which is also a high plate Skyliner. The OD on this amp is really in the gainy Santana territory, whereas my #102 is a lot less gainy, this is with my favourite p90/broadcaster pickup telecaster. I've just ordered a pair of 250k CTS audio pots as I have 300k linear in there at the moment on the drive/volume and I wonder if that's skewing my perception of the sound with everything at 12 O'clock settings. when I looked at the #183 details they pots seemed nearer 300k than 250k so I went with 300's I'll see if that makes a difference when I swap them. I also read that a linear pot might be better on the drive, we'll see.
I had a bitt of a pre amp valve rolling today and ended up going back to the sovtek in V1 but replacing the NOS ruby with a TAD 12 ax7. I've got the OD trimmer on 23k so only 1k from the original #183 so it shouldn't be that far from how it's voiced to sound.
the clean is really sweet, it's brighter than the #102 but it's very full and sustains nicely, as I said previously it's almost like a cross between the BM and the #102.
overall I'm pleased with the build from my own point of view. I managed to sort out the problems without any hand holding from Martin and I feel I've come a long way from where I started when I jumped in the deep end with very little knowledge or skill
I shall, report back when I've had chance to paly it more and more importantly make a cabinet...it's not finished until it's sat in a wooden,tolex/suede covered box!!
once again, thanks to all who've contributed advice and help on this build
M
- martin manning
- Posts: 14308
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: yes.... I Know....I'm starting a #183 build!
It's those black resistors! ;^)norburybrook wrote: ↑Thu Jan 24, 2019 10:53 pmThe OD on this amp is really in the gainy Santana territory, whereas my #102 is a lot less gainy...
Re: yes.... I Know....I'm starting a #183 build!
Gottcha!. It's not skewing your perception!.It does have more gain.The main reason is because both drive and OD levels are 250K instead of 100k.(they act as voltage dividers ) Which is why I said in my description several posts back that the amp is better used as a "Rock" type sound or in your case "Santana"norburybrook wrote: ↑Thu Jan 24, 2019 10:53 pmthanks Tony.talbany wrote: ↑Thu Jan 24, 2019 9:10 pm Marcus
Nice work and congrats!.A few questions regarding your 183 amp?
1. Can you tell a difference in an ODS with EL-34's vs 6L's
2. What style of music do you think that circuit best suits?
3. What guitar sounds best to you in that amp?
4. Which blooms and sustains best?
5. Which amp is the most fun to play?
As far as the PAB goes. I rarely use that function at home in my studio just woodshedding however I use it quite frequently in a band setting especially with my les Paul.![]()
Yeah I am not going to build anymore either.![]()
Tony
I'll answer your questions when I've had chance to get to know this one better.
My first impressions were really about the overdrive on this amp compared to the #102 which is also a high plate Skyliner. The OD on this amp is really in the gainy Santana territory, whereas my #102 is a lot less gainy, this is with my favourite p90/broadcaster pickup telecaster. I've just ordered a pair of 250k CTS audio pots as I have 300k linear in there at the moment on the drive/volume and I wonder if that's skewing my perception of the sound with everything at 12 O'clock settings. when I looked at the #183 details they pots seemed nearer 300k than 250k so I went with 300's I'll see if that makes a difference when I swap them. I also read that a linear pot might be better on the drive, we'll see.
I had a bitt of a pre amp valve rolling today and ended up going back to the sovtek in V1 but replacing the NOS ruby with a TAD 12 ax7. I've got the OD trimmer on 23k so only 1k from the original #183 so it shouldn't be that far from how it's voiced to sound.
the clean is really sweet, it's brighter than the #102 but it's very full and sustains nicely, as I said previously it's almost like a cross between the BM and the #102.
overall I'm pleased with the build from my own point of view. I managed to sort out the problems without any hand holding from Martin and I feel I've come a long way from where I started when I jumped in the deep end with very little knowledge or skill![]()
I shall, report back when I've had chance to paly it more and more importantly make a cabinet...it's not finished until it's sat in a wooden,tolex/suede covered box!!
once again, thanks to all who've contributed advice and help on this build![]()
M
If you don't like all that gain coming on so quickly go with the Audio tapers.
If you don't like all that gain go back to 100k and you will have another 102.
BTW.I have an SSS that sounds like Stevie Ray Vaughan
Just poking fun at ya!
Enjoy your new Mexican rocker!
Tony
Last edited by talbany on Fri Jan 25, 2019 1:11 am, edited 3 times in total.
" The psychics on my bench is the same as Dumble'"