ODS 124 - revisited for the 21C

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
Stephen1966
Posts: 1017
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2019 1:53 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: ODS 124 - revisited for the 21C

Post by Stephen1966 »

rootz wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 6:25 pm This looks very different from what I did when I crossed the 005 and 124 (or at least did an attempt). Can you explain why you'd want reverb on only the clean channel? You use an extra relay for the reverb, when you could easily use an extra relay to switch reverb level pots. With a DPDT relay you could actually switch reverb send and return controls. The Coral does that IIRC.

One thing that occurs to me as an error in your latest reverb schematic: how much signal will the reverb mixing triode see? There essentially is a 1:1 voltage divider on the grid of that tube, so it will see half the maximum output of the clean preamp! I think this means it will be very easy to overdrive the grid of the mixer stage. You need to dump more signal, like a filter section would.

It's been a while since I've been tinkering with different reverb ideas. Last time, I had a good look at many pictures of the Steel String Sultan from AN, which I was told is a clone of the HPD, which in turn is a clone of the 005. IIRC the attached picture is a schematic of the best I could make of all the pictures, including the lack of bypass caps for the mixer, rather strange cathode values for the 2nd clean triode, unbypassed ververs driver cathode resistor. Just ran some quick sims of it: 100mV input signal of 1kHz with all controls on noon gets me a whopping 42V peak-peak at the anode of the second clean triode. You do not want that on the grid of the reverb mixer; it would make your amp useless. After the filter I get 300 mV peak-peak on the grid of the reverb mixer triode, which translates to 8V peak-peak at the output. More than enough to drive the PI pretty hard with the master on 10 :).

So to summarise: dump much more signal before the reverb mixer triode, just like the filter would do.
First of all, thanks rootz, that you can build sims is brilliant. I'm going to have to get to grips with LTSpice at some point. There's a lot of guesswork over here at the moment but I had my doubts about just removing the filters and letting the current through. Before I saw your simulation over at https://ampgarage.com/forum/viewtopic.p ... 73#p410873 I was considering breaking the filter part of the circuit down into a lite version but preserving the impedance. I didn't really want to include a SSS filter and then I saw your version.

ODS RVB 2.4.pdf

You didn't really go into it at the time, the topic was about the #005 after all, but this is a version I cobbled together from your design. I may have got the path from the OD relay wrong, so I am trying it your way. I've also reconfigured the RVB relay to switch the level pots. I was unsure where to place it in the circuit, the aim being to isolate the RVB entirely but if I have this straight, this (with the level pots) does the same job.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Stephen
www.primatone.eu
Stephen1966
Posts: 1017
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2019 1:53 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: ODS 124 - revisited for the 21C

Post by Stephen1966 »

rootz wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 6:25 pm ...Just ran some quick sims of it: 100mV input signal of 1kHz with all controls on noon gets me a whopping 42V peak-peak at the anode of the second clean triode. You do not want that on the grid of the reverb mixer; it would make your amp useless. After the filter I get 300 mV peak-peak on the grid of the reverb mixer triode, which translates to 8V peak-peak at the output. More than enough to drive the PI pretty hard with the master on 10 :).

So to summarise: dump much more signal before the reverb mixer triode, just like the filter would do.
Hi Rootz, or indeed anyone, could you tell me which formulas I should be using to calculate the voltage drop across the filter part of the circuit in my schematic (v2.4) before the mixing triode? I tried some (for resistors in parallel, resistors and caps in parallel) but I got nowhere near 300mVpp. I expect that LTSpice does this automatically but I don't have it and I would like to work out the values on paper for a better learning curve. I know I need to get from around 40Vpp from CL2's plate to 300mVpp at the mixing triode grid but I just don't know how I get there. I mean, forgive my ignorance, but this is specific stuff I need to learn. Reading around as was suggested earlier is something I do anyway but most of the time it just muddies the waters.

Stephen
Stephen
www.primatone.eu
rootz
Posts: 721
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:24 pm
Location: Delft, The Netherlands

Re: ODS 124 - revisited for the 21C

Post by rootz »

Thanks Stephen, simming is, I think a nice way to prove a concept working. Your latest design uses a DPDT relay to switch out the reverb. I don't think you need a DPDT to do that. I'd consider the option to just ground the reverb return tube grid. That way you keep the loading the same at the grid of the mixer tube (virtual earth mixer). IIRC the Deluxe reverb just grounds the output of the reverb recovery tube just behind the coupling cap. That would work too.

Thinking about dumping much of the signal the filter would dump: Fender uses a plain and simple 3.3meg resistor paralleled by a 10 pF cap there. There is a penalty though: on high reverb settings the high end takes a hit...

Another solution would be to go full Fender reverb, like the Two Rock CRS mk1. This would mean the reverb return pot directly at the reverb recovery triode's output, much like a deluxe reverb. You could even give the mixing triode a bit of lnfb.

So, you've got roughly 3 reverb options: 1) Fender reverb, 2) 005 type reverb (modified Fender) and 3) a 002/004 style reverb (mixing at either the cathodes of a CF or the plates of the mixing tubes). I found option 3 to be the most elegant way to do it, with the least predicted impact on overall frequency response when turning the reverb return pot. That also comes pretty close to the reverb in the John Mayer amp.

In all cases, if you slip the reverb section between the OD-relay output and the input of the master volume, it's really not much more than an add-on. You could even add the reverb after the master, right in front, in or behind the effects loop. I choose not to, only to be able to hit the reverb driver with as much signal as I can, like again a deluxe reverb would. Not that the reverb would sound bad otherwise, the CRS mk2 proves that. The way you do it in ODS RVB 2.4 is exactly the way I did my reverbs: after the OD relay, but before the master reverb. It simply works and is much like adding a reverb in the effects loop.
Stephen1966
Posts: 1017
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2019 1:53 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: ODS 124 - revisited for the 21C

Post by Stephen1966 »

rootz wrote: Mon Apr 05, 2021 1:08 pm Thanks Stephen, simming is, I think a nice way to prove a concept working. Your latest design uses a DPDT relay to switch out the reverb. I don't think you need a DPDT to do that. I'd consider the option to just ground the reverb return tube grid. That way you keep the loading the same at the grid of the mixer tube (virtual earth mixer). IIRC the Deluxe reverb just grounds the output of the reverb recovery tube just behind the coupling cap. That would work too.

Thinking about dumping much of the signal the filter would dump: Fender uses a plain and simple 3.3meg resistor paralleled by a 10 pF cap there. There is a penalty though: on high reverb settings the high end takes a hit...

Another solution would be to go full Fender reverb, like the Two Rock CRS mk1. This would mean the reverb return pot directly at the reverb recovery triode's output, much like a deluxe reverb. You could even give the mixing triode a bit of lnfb.

So, you've got roughly 3 reverb options: 1) Fender reverb, 2) 005 type reverb (modified Fender) and 3) a 002/004 style reverb (mixing at either the cathodes of a CF or the plates of the mixing tubes). I found option 3 to be the most elegant way to do it, with the least predicted impact on overall frequency response when turning the reverb return pot. That also comes pretty close to the reverb in the John Mayer amp.

In all cases, if you slip the reverb section between the OD-relay output and the input of the master volume, it's really not much more than an add-on. You could even add the reverb after the master, right in front, in or behind the effects loop. I choose not to, only to be able to hit the reverb driver with as much signal as I can, like again a deluxe reverb would. Not that the reverb would sound bad otherwise, the CRS mk2 proves that. The way you do it in ODS RVB 2.4 is exactly the way I did my reverbs: after the OD relay, but before the master reverb. It simply works and is much like adding a reverb in the effects loop.
Thanks again. I started out looking at the AB763 reverb and didn't like the 3.3M mixing resistors impact on the tone. A few guys around here, tried to mitigate that with much lower value resistors IIRC (I had to Google what IIRC meant :lol: ) as low as 220k and the BF reverb is generally looked down on, as not the best way to do it in a Dumble. That sent me looking at #002, #013 and #060 but I returned to #005 because of the mixing triode and the two tube design. Space being a consideration. I do like the way you did it, so I'll take another look at your third option. I have faith in your design though and until I get a more complete understanding of how these circuits can be shaped, I will stick with it. Please tell me though, it appears you ran a couple of simulations of your 124/005 hybrid. In the simulation at the top of your screenshot R55 is a 6Meg8 resistor and in the one below, its equivalent is R238 5Meg6, similarly in the top simulation the cap and the resistor to ground are 15p and 68k, while in the one below, they are 22p and 82k. There also appears to be a 1 ohm resistor (R243) right before the mixer's grid in the top simulation. I'm not familiar with LTSpice so I can't know where the traces (alongside) are pulled from. Speaking pragmatically, I will simply be happy if it works, but I won't be content until I fully understand what's going on. My gut tells me that the top simulation would be less likely to overdrive the mixing triode than the one underneath. If so, that's what I would go for because I would like to keep the high end tame and let the 124 part of the circuit breath. Working systematically through the toffee-shop of mods that are possible it became clear to me that anything I added had to have as little impact on the 124 signature sound as possible. I expect the reverb will produce some hiss, I expect its impedance with will affect the tone upstream and down, but I want to keep that to a minimum. If it's to be any good, it shouldn't sound like a cheap pedal :)

I see your point, the DPDT relay could be a SPDT. The Fender way, with the BF and the Prosonic as well (IIRC) used a ground before the recovery triode to kill the signal as well. In the BF it's a jack but a footswitch activating a relay is a more spontaneous way to do it on the fly, when I want to send the sound to that other place. Still, that's easy enough to do. One of the advantages as I see it of coupling the relay with the level pots at the front of the chassis is that I could keep the lead dress both fairly short and tidy. This is like spinning plates though, and I'm thinking of using higher standoffs underneath the board so that I can minimize any coupling from any high current extras I drop in. I don't really see a problem with switching the line feeding the grid, to ground from a relay at the front of the chassis.
Stephen
www.primatone.eu
rootz
Posts: 721
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:24 pm
Location: Delft, The Netherlands

Re: ODS 124 - revisited for the 21C

Post by rootz »

I'm not a fan of the 3meg3 resistor either. I'd rather have more lnfb around the mixer triode: more bandwidth, flatter frequency response, lower distortion (at least when not overdriven). What I also like is loading the preamp stages like a normal master volume would do: 1meg. The 1meg/68k combo in the John Mayer amp/Wonderland does just that. I mean, why would you want to load the preamp any different than in a normal master volume would? In that respect I do not see how a reverb would be a different load, apart from a tiny load on the highs from the reverb send pot and cap that is preceding it.

But it would still be a balancing act between enough reverb, enough drive from the pre-amp with attenuating network before the mixer triode. Those are not exactly things you can easily breadboard I think, or at least I can't. I decided against the Fender/005 type reverb before the master volume, because I couldn't design a circuit that assured the mixer triode wouldn't clip with PAB on and the gain dialed up. That is actually a lot easier when you just put a Fender reverb after the master volume and loop. That would be the way Two Rock did the CRS mk1. There is a schematic of that amp on the forum, by Larry IIRC.

Those different value caps and resistors is just to make comparing frequency responses in LTspice a bit easier. There are no big differences there. The 1 ohm resistor is a leftover from a grid stopper you'd find there in a 005.
Stephen1966
Posts: 1017
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2019 1:53 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: ODS 124 - revisited for the 21C

Post by Stephen1966 »

Stephen
www.primatone.eu
Stephen1966
Posts: 1017
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2019 1:53 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: ODS 124 - revisited for the 21C

Post by Stephen1966 »

Does anyone know if Larry's hand drawn sketch of the Two Rock is the same as the Ceriotone "Joyful Music 100"? I've been trying to make sense of Larry's drawing. He apparently didn't bother drawing out the send and return tubes because he said its the same as BF and SF fenders but the send and return placement after the Rev block are not AB763 design. The Ceriotone is a layout but I could understand Larry's schematic better if anyone could confirm they are the same... with Two Rock's it could be anyone's guess :lol:

Unfortunately, Larry never seemed to get around to drawing the schematic in Express and it doesn't appear he is around anymore... hope he only moved to an internet free life of luxury on a Caribbean island.
Stephen
www.primatone.eu
User avatar
norburybrook
Posts: 3290
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: ODS 124 - revisited for the 21C

Post by norburybrook »

Stephen1966 wrote: Tue Apr 06, 2021 5:45 pm Does anyone know if Larry's hand drawn sketch of the Two Rock is the same as the Ceriotone "Joyful Music 100"? I've been trying to make sense of Larry's drawing. He apparently didn't bother drawing out the send and return tubes because he said its the same as BF and SF fenders but the send and return placement after the Rev block are not AB763 design. The Ceriotone is a layout but I could understand Larry's schematic better if anyone could confirm they are the same... with Two Rock's it could be anyone's guess :lol:

Unfortunately, Larry never seemed to get around to drawing the schematic in Express and it doesn't appear he is around anymore... hope he only moved to an internet free life of luxury on a Caribbean island.
I think the Ceriatone is a copy of the none cathode follower SSS..is that #002? basically a JM wonderland with filters :)

I did have a layout for the ceriatone but it's on a different computer I'll see if i can dig it out,

M

edit: found it
Ceriatone SSS ChassisLayout.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
erwin_ve
Posts: 1792
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 8:06 am
Location: Dordrecht, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: ODS 124 - revisited for the 21C

Post by erwin_ve »

norburybrook wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 10:23 am
Stephen1966 wrote: Tue Apr 06, 2021 5:45 pm Does anyone know if Larry's hand drawn sketch of the Two Rock is the same as the Ceriotone "Joyful Music 100"? I've been trying to make sense of Larry's drawing. He apparently didn't bother drawing out the send and return tubes because he said its the same as BF and SF fenders but the send and return placement after the Rev block are not AB763 design. The Ceriotone is a layout but I could understand Larry's schematic better if anyone could confirm they are the same... with Two Rock's it could be anyone's guess :lol:

Unfortunately, Larry never seemed to get around to drawing the schematic in Express and it doesn't appear he is around anymore... hope he only moved to an internet free life of luxury on a Caribbean island.
I think the Ceriatone is a copy of the none cathode follower SSS..is that #002? basically a JM wonderland with filters :)

I did have a layout for the ceriatone but it's on a different computer I'll see if i can dig it out,

M

edit: found it

Ceriatone SSS ChassisLayout.jpg
SSS002 is different from the Ceriatone SSS; SSS002 had 7 preamp tubes, Ceriatone has 5 preamp tubes; Ceriatone has a different reverb /mixer and no cathode follower PI. The Ceriatone SSS version is derived from a SSS004.
talbany
Posts: 4696
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 5:03 am
Location: Dumbleland

Re: ODS 124 - revisited for the 21C

Post by talbany »

The 1st Ceriatone SSS was lifted from the Sterling which was lifted from Keisers Black 004 (Erwin mentions)
The Wonderland is also lifted from the Sterling but with a Classic Stack no filters and no DC Driver and a few more switches

Question then? What's the difference between a Wonderland and a Fender Twin Reverb AB763 without the roach?..(Not much) :lol:


IMO what makes an SSS so unique and different is the Filters and the driver..

Tony
sss51.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
" The psychics on my bench is the same as Dumble'"
User avatar
norburybrook
Posts: 3290
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: ODS 124 - revisited for the 21C

Post by norburybrook »

talbany wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:59 am The 1st Ceriatone SSS was lifted from the Sterling which was lifted from Keisers Black 004 (Erwin mentions)
The Wonderland is also lifted from the Sterling but with a Classic Stack no filters and no DC Driver and a few more switches

Question then? What's the difference between a Wonderland and a Fender Twin Reverb AB763 without the roach?..(Not much) :lol:


IMO what makes an SSS so unique and different is the Filters and the driver..

Tonysss51.jpg
are the filters useful and once set do they give a different feel/sound than a tonestack? Yes I can imagine the Cf/driver making a feel/tonal difference :) Isn't the reverb in the wonderland different to a 763?

question: would it be possible to add the filters and the driver to my wonderland? I'd need a couple more tubes but would it be possible to hang the extra circuitry from the tubes/tag strips?

M

p.s. interesting about the tube screamer, it does indeed work well with my JM amp for that particular strat/srv type thing. I dug mine out recently to try after you and erwins posts :mrgreen:
User avatar
norburybrook
Posts: 3290
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: ODS 124 - revisited for the 21C

Post by norburybrook »

erwin_ve wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 10:41 am
norburybrook wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 10:23 am
Stephen1966 wrote: Tue Apr 06, 2021 5:45 pm Does anyone know if Larry's hand drawn sketch of the Two Rock is the same as the Ceriotone "Joyful Music 100"? I've been trying to make sense of Larry's drawing. He apparently didn't bother drawing out the send and return tubes because he said its the same as BF and SF fenders but the send and return placement after the Rev block are not AB763 design. The Ceriotone is a layout but I could understand Larry's schematic better if anyone could confirm they are the same... with Two Rock's it could be anyone's guess :lol:

Unfortunately, Larry never seemed to get around to drawing the schematic in Express and it doesn't appear he is around anymore... hope he only moved to an internet free life of luxury on a Caribbean island.
I think the Ceriatone is a copy of the none cathode follower SSS..is that #002? basically a JM wonderland with filters :)

I did have a layout for the ceriatone but it's on a different computer I'll see if i can dig it out,

M

edit: found it

Ceriatone SSS ChassisLayout.jpg
SSS002 is different from the Ceriatone SSS; SSS002 had 7 preamp tubes, Ceriatone has 5 preamp tubes; Ceriatone has a different reverb /mixer and no cathode follower PI. The Ceriatone SSS version is derived from a SSS004.
yes I wasn't sure I knew it was one of them :) #004 it is :)

M
talbany
Posts: 4696
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 5:03 am
Location: Dumbleland

Re: ODS 124 - revisited for the 21C

Post by talbany »

norburybrook wrote: Thu Apr 08, 2021 11:36 am
talbany wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:59 am The 1st Ceriatone SSS was lifted from the Sterling which was lifted from Keisers Black 004 (Erwin mentions)
The Wonderland is also lifted from the Sterling but with a Classic Stack no filters and no DC Driver and a few more switches

Question then? What's the difference between a Wonderland and a Fender Twin Reverb AB763 without the roach?..(Not much) :lol:


IMO what makes an SSS so unique and different is the Filters and the driver..

Tonysss51.jpg



are the filters useful and once set do they give a different feel/sound than a tonestack? Yes I can imagine the Cf/driver making a feel/tonal difference :) Isn't the reverb in the wonderland different to a 763?

question: would it be possible to add the filters and the driver to my wonderland? I'd need a couple more tubes but would it be possible to hang the extra circuitry from the tubes/tag strips?

M

p.s. interesting about the tube screamer, it does indeed work well with my JM amp for that particular strat/srv type thing. I dug mine out recently to try after you and erwins posts :mrgreen:
BINGO :D An extra gain stage (Reverb Mixer)
Ser#005 SSS The only difference is the Skyliner stack and Filters (That would be an easy Twin conversion)

I use around 3-4 different filter settings depending on the room and size of the cabinet and some of the settings are for me kind of useless for guitar but that does add another gainstage for the filter recovery

IMO the reverb in 001 and 002 is a bit better than the one used in the Wonderland and a lot better than the one in #005

Tony
" The psychics on my bench is the same as Dumble'"
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: ODS 124 - revisited for the 21C

Post by martin manning »

norburybrook wrote: Thu Apr 08, 2021 11:36 am...are the filters useful and once set do they give a different feel/sound than a tonestack?
The filters provide a more precise level control for high and low frequencies than a TMB stack does, with less interaction, centered around ~400 Hz. In the revised filter circuit I posted I tried to go further in that direction.
norburybrook wrote: Thu Apr 08, 2021 11:36 amquestion: would it be possible to add the filters and the driver to my wonderland? I'd need a couple more tubes but would it be possible to hang the extra circuitry from the tubes/tag strips?
You could build the filters into a pedal enclosure and plug into the FX loop of an amp or a Dumbleator to test drive. They will cut about 24 dB on average. They need some panel space for the two rotary switches, so maybe difficult to retrofit to an existing amp. The driver tube needs relatively few components around it, and the power supply could be handled nicely by replacing the usual D-style bias supply/HV rectifier board with one that produces a bipolar voltage for the driver from the 60VAC bias tap. I posted a layout for that.
User avatar
norburybrook
Posts: 3290
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: ODS 124 - revisited for the 21C

Post by norburybrook »

martin manning wrote: Thu Apr 08, 2021 1:58 pm
norburybrook wrote: Thu Apr 08, 2021 11:36 am...are the filters useful and once set do they give a different feel/sound than a tonestack?
The filters provide a more precise level control for high and low frequencies than a TMB stack does, with less interaction, centered around ~400 Hz. In the revised filter circuit I posted I tried to go further in that direction.
norburybrook wrote: Thu Apr 08, 2021 11:36 amquestion: would it be possible to add the filters and the driver to my wonderland? I'd need a couple more tubes but would it be possible to hang the extra circuitry from the tubes/tag strips?
You could build the filters into a pedal enclosure and plug into the FX loop of an amp or a Dumbleator to test drive. They will cut about 24 dB on average. They need some panel space for the two rotary switches, so maybe difficult to retrofit to an existing amp. The driver tube needs relatively few components around it, and the power supply could be handled nicely by replacing the usual D-style bias supply/HV rectifier board with one that produces a bipolar voltage for the driver from the 60VAC bias tap. I posted a layout for that.
Interesting.....so filters in a box with a Dumbleator would that give me the same feel/sound as the SSS then as I presume the dumbleator is acting as the driver/CF?

M
Post Reply