D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
- Funkalicousgroove
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 8:04 pm
- Location: Denver, CO
- Contact:
Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto
I think it is more of a utilitarian approach, but I also think each part was tested. There seems to be alot of military surplus parts, and blister-pack(NTE, Radio shack, Sprague) parts, so my guess is he used what was available.
Owner/Solder Jockey Bludotone Amp Works
Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto
Very nice build!
Forgive my ignorance, but what cap and resistor are meant with the "0.01uF/250k midrange setup "?
The very first cap on the board on the preamp side?
Forgive my ignorance, but what cap and resistor are meant with the "0.01uF/250k midrange setup "?
The very first cap on the board on the preamp side?
Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto
Wow, I know you've been working on that amp for a while.
I heard amongst the builders in different forums mention that the amp takes a journey before coming into it's own.
Funny how that works.
Congrats on the great build and sharing.
I heard amongst the builders in different forums mention that the amp takes a journey before coming into it's own.
Funny how that works.
Congrats on the great build and sharing.
Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto
Yes, the 0.01uF replaces the stock 0.05uF that connects the the Midrange control. The 250kA Midrange potentiometer replaces the 100k control.tsl602000 wrote:Very nice build!
Forgive my ignorance, but what cap and resistor are meant with the "0.01uF/250k midrange setup "?
The very first cap on the board on the preamp side?
67:1
Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto
Fab looking build - tons of great info.
Thanks!
Thanks!
Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto
Thanks for the info kleinm! I could figure out the cap but never thought about the pot...
Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto
Wow!!
Really nice... inside out...
Really nice... inside out...
Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto
Nice looking amp, for sure! It sounds like you've spent a lot of time and effort to get it to where you want it.kleinm wrote:Lowering the coupler off CL2 to 0.02uF helps remove some bottom end hash.
What is CL2, and what is the coupling cap off that? It seems to me that too much bass is making its way into the overdrive section on my amp, and I think that's what you're addressing here.
-g
-
groovtubin
- Posts: 1114
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 4:52 am
Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto
two .047`s in series is HALF the capacitance!greiswig wrote:Nice looking amp, for sure! It sounds like you've spent a lot of time and effort to get it to where you want it.kleinm wrote:Lowering the coupler off CL2 to 0.02uF helps remove some bottom end hash.
What is CL2, and what is the coupling cap off that? It seems to me that too much bass is making its way into the overdrive section on my amp, and I think that's what you're addressing here.
jim
Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto
Kleinm, you mind telling us what you are biasing your 6L6's at?
Thanks
Thanks
Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto
Approximately 33-34mA idle current. I'm not sure why, but I prefer the sound with a slightly colder bias on this amp....
67:1
Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto
Jim,groovtubin wrote:two .047`s in series is HALF the capacitance!greiswig wrote:Nice looking amp, for sure! It sounds like you've spent a lot of time and effort to get it to where you want it.kleinm wrote:Lowering the coupler off CL2 to 0.02uF helps remove some bottom end hash.
What is CL2, and what is the coupling cap off that? It seems to me that too much bass is making its way into the overdrive section on my amp, and I think that's what you're addressing here.SO the OD entrance is getting trimmed...
jim
I believe it, but my question was to kleinm because he seemed to think (as I do) that it may not be trimmed quite enough.
Is CL2 referring to V1b? And is the coupler you're suggesting changing to .02uf one of those two .05uF caps?
-g
Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto
Yes, CL2 is just another name for V1B. The coupler I changed is the 0.05uF that is connected to the V1B plate. I lowered that to 0.02uF.greiswig wrote:[
Jim,
I believe it, but my question was to kleinm because he seemed to think (as I do) that it may not be trimmed quite enough.
Is CL2 referring to V1b? And is the coupler you're suggesting changing to .02uf one of those two .05uF caps?
67:1
Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto
A while back I was trying to get maximum clean headroom out of the standard PI/output circuit(s). The platform was using 200ma Fender PT and Fender Prosonic 50 Watt OT. Without using my ears and just using the scope I got maximum power at 1500 to 6000 hz using the lower value screen resistors(470) and higher grid resistors (5K1). Once changed the amp sounded better too.... You can see the difference on a scope. Using the smallest value PI input cap you can stand also boosts clean headroom.Funkalicousgroove wrote:I can't believe you can hear the difference in 470 ohm and 1K screen resistors!! I can't !!
Last edited by heisthl on Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Former owner of Music Mechanix
www.RedPlateAmps.com
www.RedPlateAmps.com
Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto
Thanks for the report.