Split load plop
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
Re: Split load plop
Yes, you are right, I just edited the file.
Re: Split load plop
Hello,
ok, I understand: Marks schem is the usual way to damp plopping of a switch. Robertos RS is in a way the same but with possible shelving effect (between 330 and 1M). 2M2 is only plopp compensation.
Very interesting!
Thank you all.
Hans-Jörg
EDIT:
The 2M2 is in and is perfect! no plopp at all - soft swithing like a relay
ok, I understand: Marks schem is the usual way to damp plopping of a switch. Robertos RS is in a way the same but with possible shelving effect (between 330 and 1M). 2M2 is only plopp compensation.
Very interesting!
Thank you all.
Hans-Jörg
EDIT:
The 2M2 is in and is perfect! no plopp at all - soft swithing like a relay
-
rock_mumbles
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 2:03 am
- Location: Podunk, Idaho
- Contact:
Re: Split load plop
Roberto ...
In your split load plate diagram on the previous page ...
shouldn't the 2nf cap be in circuit in the 100k plate position and the 100n cap be in circuit with the 22k/82k split plate?
Also I don't understand the shelving effect of Rs?
In your split load plate diagram on the previous page ...
shouldn't the 2nf cap be in circuit in the 100k plate position and the 100n cap be in circuit with the 22k/82k split plate?
Also I don't understand the shelving effect of Rs?
Re: Split load plop
Hi,
I think you´r right Rock-mumbles.
I have the 2n2 at the 100k, and the 0,1 at he 82k.
Hans-Jörg
I think you´r right Rock-mumbles.
I have the 2n2 at the 100k, and the 0,1 at he 82k.
Hans-Jörg
Re: Split load plop
Ok, now should be ok.
Remember that the 82k 22k it's just a voltage divider. I mean, it can be 91k 10k, 47k 47k, 68k 33k, etc...
I think now it's all more clear.
Please look at the new attachment to the previous post.
Remember that the 82k 22k it's just a voltage divider. I mean, it can be 91k 10k, 47k 47k, 68k 33k, etc...
I think now it's all more clear.
Please look at the new attachment to the previous post.
-
rock_mumbles
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 2:03 am
- Location: Podunk, Idaho
- Contact:
Re: Split load plop
THANKS!!!roberto wrote:Ok, now should be ok.
Remember that the 82k 22k it's just a voltage divider. I mean, it can be 91k 10k, 47k 47k, 68k 33k, etc...
I think now it's all more clear.
Please look at the new attachment to the previous post.
Now it all makes sense, I understand the split load plate but I wasn't seeing the shelving from RS and RL ...
Re: Split load plop
Another option is to keep the low-side always connected, and just add the 2n2-100k side to add a 13dB boost on mid-highs.
I thought this switch as a 1M log pot with on-off switch.
This way you can turn it on and decide how much 2n2-100k sound you want to add to the 100n-22k sound.
I thought this switch as a 1M log pot with on-off switch.
This way you can turn it on and decide how much 2n2-100k sound you want to add to the 100n-22k sound.
Re: Split load plop
That's slick!roberto wrote:I thought this switch as a 1M log pot with on-off switch.
This way you can turn it on and decide how much 2n2-100k sound you want to add to the 100n-22k sound.
Re: Split load plop
Something like this, without the switch.
On the Plot file you can see the effect of the pot set to: 1M 470k 100k 10k 0.
On the Plot file you can see the effect of the pot set to: 1M 470k 100k 10k 0.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Split load plop
Other ideas; no popping problem...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Split load plop
Hi,
nice way to use the second triode
But the poti variation from Roberto beats all
Much better than to switch "only" in and out. With this on/off poti you can switch to the existing 82k/100n the 100k/2n2 and dail it in to the "quantity" you want. Its famous!
Thank you both.
Hans-Jörg
nice way to use the second triode
But the poti variation from Roberto beats all
Much better than to switch "only" in and out. With this on/off poti you can switch to the existing 82k/100n the 100k/2n2 and dail it in to the "quantity" you want. Its famous!
Thank you both.
Hans-Jörg