Liverpool el84s

Express, Liverpool, Rocket, Dirty Little Monster, etc.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
User avatar
Buschman
Posts: 419
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 5:12 pm
Location: Beaumont Texas
Contact:

Liverpool el84s

Post by Buschman »

Does there seem to be a favorite el84 for the Liverpool. I am running a mixture of Sovtec and JJ used junk and think it sounds great. Curious what the cork sniffer tubes would do. What did Ken like?
I've got blisters on my fingers!
User avatar
UR12
Posts: 1570
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 7:22 pm

Re: Liverpool el84s

Post by UR12 »

Buschman wrote:Does there seem to be a favorite el84 for the Liverpool. I am running a mixture of Sovtec and JJ used junk and think it sounds great. Curious what the cork sniffer tubes would do. What did Ken like?
My favorites so far, are NOS GE EL84s and NOS GE Long plate 12AX7s. The only problem is finding a long plate that will work in the V1 spot that isn't microphonic.

This should be a fun thread 8)
Fischerman
Posts: 819
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 3:47 pm
Location: Georgia

Re: Liverpool el84s

Post by Fischerman »

For a reasonably priced, stout EL84 a lot of folks like the surplus Russian military tubes. The Russian designation is 6pi14pi (where pi is our pi symbol)...they are also nicknamed 'Saratovs'.

There are at least two versions. One version has discolored pins and looks exactly like an EH EL84 on the inside. The other has shiny pins and doesn't look like any other EL84s I have internally...these are sold by Sovtek as the EL84M (it MUST have the 'M' designation). I have a close-up picture of both plus an EH but it's at home. If I remember I'll post it.

Preamp tubes you just have to find via trial and error imo. IMO, JJ ECC83s have a subdued top end, JJ ECC803S are very sparkley on top but prone to microphonics, Tung Sol reissues have a high-mid presence, and EH have a fat bottom end.
Plague
Posts: 74
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 3:58 pm

Re: Liverpool el84s

Post by Plague »

I love my made in Holland Hammond's. They are actually Amperex ones from the 50's
User avatar
dartanion
Posts: 1562
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:02 pm
Location: San Jose, CA
Contact:

Re: Liverpool el84s

Post by dartanion »

Saratovs or the EL84M Sovteks, and NOS Mullards also sound great. The Russian Military versions are solid and somewhat dark, more like a 7189. If you want more chime and brightness, use an EL84/6BQ5, preferably RCA or GE for US made; Mullards, Amperex, Telefunkens and RFTs sound nice too.
Eardrums!!! We don't need no stinkin' eardrums!
MikeMcK
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 4:32 am

Re: Liverpool el84s

Post by MikeMcK »

Buschman wrote:Curious what the cork sniffer tubes would do. What did Ken like?
From here: http://www.ultimateguitargear.com/ken_fischer_story.htm

"Groove Tubes were the standard tubes in Trainwreck amps for years. ... Groove Tubes always had good EL-84's and I'd recommend them for any EL-84 equipped amp. Grade #4 for a "Wreck," and grade #6 for a J.M.I. Vox."

Now, exactly what Groove Tubes were shipping back then is a question for folks more knowledgeable than me.
User avatar
dartanion
Posts: 1562
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:02 pm
Location: San Jose, CA
Contact:

Re: Liverpool el84s

Post by dartanion »

MikeMcK wrote:
Buschman wrote:Curious what the cork sniffer tubes would do. What did Ken like?
From here: http://www.ultimateguitargear.com/ken_fischer_story.htm

"Groove Tubes were the standard tubes in Trainwreck amps for years. ... Groove Tubes always had good EL-84's and I'd recommend them for any EL-84 equipped amp. Grade #4 for a "Wreck," and grade #6 for a J.M.I. Vox."

Now, exactly what Groove Tubes were shipping back then is a question for folks more knowledgeable than me.
Not the same stuff any more for the most part. Nowadays, it's a challenge to find ANY new production tubes that are decent. Things have gotten better in the past couple of years, but we're still light years behind how things were done classically. QA/QC is still pretty bad from the factory.
Eardrums!!! We don't need no stinkin' eardrums!
Post Reply